Hi, I’m a bit late to reply, but hope the input will help @JoshFossgreen .
Sorry if this is very wordy, but I am hoping to convey a specific need.
Simple answer is yes, more theory please. But with a specific twist.
I think Josh strongest advantage is his ability to break down the progression of skills into bite-sized, very practical exercises, but also ramp those up to a high level by hand-holding and walking you along the way.
I’ll give two examples, because they relate to what I’d love to see from a theory course:
-
The YoutTUbe video about the finger exercise using the walk-up/walk-down (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=riCDOFyRIZ4).
You can see how we start very simple, and VERY practical - Josh tells you exactly what to do, where to place your fingers and what to aim for.
But by the end we are looking at putting together some theory and chord notes as well as moving the exercise along to other chords and using it in real life.
-
The seocnd example is the B2B lessosn on improv (Module 8 lesson 4). Improv is very intimidating, and very hard to know where to start. There are so many notes on the neck!
If you go back to this lesson it is a masterclass in how a teacher can walk a student through something complex and intimidating, and make it immediately useful. Josh makes sure the notes we use are clear, why we use those notes, gets the student to be familiar with the notes, and then introduces the rhythm frame (and makes sure the students practices the rhythm only), then we go into practicing with changing just one note. Etc. You get the point. Very slow, hand-holding approach that makes sure no student is left behind.
The key in those examples is the slow buildup and the specificity of what to do (which is what feels like hand-holding).
So - I hope this can be brought into the theory lessons somehow.
I find that starting with theory is intimidating to me specifically because of time availability. (I’m a full time shift-worker in healthcare with two kids. Not a lot of extra time in the day).
It is not hard to grasp the concepts in my head. But what is hard is to sit down with the bass and map out what’s in my head into the guitar, and then practice it and making it relate to playing music.
If I went to music college that is I would be doing for 4 years of my life all day. Alas, I have about 10-20 minutes a day at best and when I try sitting down and mapping out thoughts in my head into the bass it takes time. By the time I get anywhere I need to go get the kids their dinner, or do laundry or whatever it is that we are busy with.
This is why I loved the improv lesson so much. It would have taken me probably days to get there alone, because by the time I figured out the scale and chord notes, my practice time is over.
So (finally!) - what I am hoping from a theory course is the same approach with theory. Josh is already very good at mapping exercises and connecting the knowledge in the head to the fingers on the bass to the way the music sounds (see the improv lesson).
I assume that when one learns theory there are some exercises that are done on paper before moving to the guitar. I would like to see the same bite-size, hand-holding approach to doing those exercises as well. For example: what should I do to slowly learn my circle of 5ths? I don’t know, but I bet Josh will have some clear, concise, slow-build exercise, and he will find a way to tie it into a song or a finger exercise.
OK - hope it wasn’t too wordy, but I can find a million theory books, videos and classes online. What I really need is Josh’s bite-size, hand-holding ™ touch to pull me along.
-
What motivates me? To be able to understand the music I play, be able to jam with friends more easily, and understand my favorite songs and why they work so well.
-
Playing maybe 3 years, but practicing very sporadically and not in a well directed fashion.