versus
The interesting thing is it is probably a nice bass, just not a Fodera ![]()
That is some world-class Rabid Badger relicāing.
Looks more Jackson Pollockād than relicād to me.
Wrong thread. This monstrosity belongs here:
Once he gets to 88bpm heāll be able to rectify that.
OK, @MikeC , you have been elegantly avoiding some of our remarks, but it is becoming very obvious that the frequency of 5āers has gone up in your posts⦠beyond what one could swipe away with, uhm, statistics ![]()
How close are you to closing the deal (ugh, nice sentence there)?? Do I need to inquire with your pusher in the Netherlands (if I were on speaking terms with him
)??
Weāre all concerned for you!
The unfortunate truth is that there seems to be a plethora of fivers being made by builders in recent years. Moreās the pity. ![]()
That said, the bass beauties that catch my eye do so despite their one-too-many number of strings. It is actually their overall designs and materials that are attractive to me.
I have yet to find any need to find love on the wrong side of the fretboard. ![]()
Here you go, @joergkutter
Yep, Elrick makes some good basses⦠also with 4 strings ![]()
thereās also a plethora of them being played too. it seems more and more bassists in bands are switching to 5s, to get a ābigger soundā. in quotes because iām not sure you actually get a lot bigger sound than a 4. as howard always points out i think you only get like 5 extra notes or something.
There definitely are many playing fivers, but there are more playing fours. Iām fully content to be in the latter camp. ![]()
Not an Elrick. Itās a Skjold.
![]()
Ah, damn⦠yes, shouldāve recognized the headstock shape ![]()
+1 - prefer 4ās by a lot.
The unfortunate truth
Your post sums it up completelyā¦





