Respectfully, I couldn’t disagree more. I find the Heritage 3 preamp controls on my Sires logically and conveniently laid out. That said, I set the preamp where I like on my Sires and rarely touch them thereafter.
Also, you don’t have to interact with the preamp settings often, or ever, if you don’t need to.
If you don’t want to mess with your preamp at all, you can simply leave all knobs at the 0 position, or simply bypass the preamp entirely and play in passive mode.
The staggering of those bridge saddles does not look similar to multiscale at all, more an offset to compensate for the limited intonation range of the split saddles.
Indeed. But here I am talking about not liking the preamp and the controls…
I have other basses that are active, the Dingwall, the EHB, a Hohner that must be 35+ years old. I prefer the controls of these basses over the Sire.
It’s as pretty standard layout, B/T LM/UM Passive/Active and Passive tone control.
Wait till you start acquiring ones with Serie/ Parallel switch on top of that as both sounds great but when to use it, Worse, if you have control on all 4 Band EQ, Passive/ Active, Series/ Parallel on Each of the 3 noiseless Single coil as well as the Passive tone control. That and I’m obligated to know all of the differences after all the bass has my name on it.
I understand. Players have preferences in instrument features.
My active basses are my two Mayones Jabbas and my Sire M5 and V8. Their respective 3-band preamp controls layouts are similar, but the Sire Heritage 3 features even more granular adjustments.
I usually put it in the middle, roll it all the way off, I just have to fight to be heard. Too much Sub is not so good for articulation signals unless I’m just chugging.