Beauty's in the eye of the beholder

I know there are hundreds of Bass styles to choose from, but does anyone else feel that a large majority of Bass designs are Fugly? Why is that the case?

No

6 Likes

Cause most don’t mod their basses :slight_smile:

2 Likes

Nope, I don’t think the majority of bass designs are fugly. I viscerally dislike two different models I’ve seen, but that’s about it.

3 Likes

ezgif.com-gif-maker-43

But no I don’t agree with the original question. In fact I kind of think the opposite. I think most basses (and guitars) are works of art. Even the “crappy” mass produced beginner ones. There are designs I don’t like, and there are designs I like but don’t like playing the bass.

4 Likes

I am a huge fan of the more quirky designs. Ironically the more traditional ones don’t interest me as much.

What’s interesting (to me anyway) is I am not that way on guitar. I like the classically inspired ones as well.

3 Likes

Fugly might be too strong a term but I definitely have a specific look I go for and when I skim through sweetwater there are very few that match.

Yamaha TBRX line, Dingwall Combustion, Ibanez SR series, Schecter C series, Sire Marcus Miller M series, and ESP Ltd B and F series body shapes are the only ones I like 100% and wouldn’t change a thing on.

Of the above colour options limit the selection even more. Sire have a habit of putting skunk stripes round the edges of the colours I really like, which I don’t like.

2 Likes

I dislike nearly all brown bursts

I don’t dislike Danelectro instruments per se, but they make me giggle

Antigua is right out

Otherwise, I love me some exceptionally odd basses. As should be clear by my buying habits and SBV worship.

3 Likes

Hmmm… I kind of agree on the wood colored bursts. Saying that my 6 string and my Reverend are both wood colored bursts. The Epi, I’ve had for decades and isn’t going anywhere. The Reverend, I’ll deal with the color because I got the bass for more than half off (and was brand new when I bought it).

4 Likes

Actually natural ones can be quite nice. It’s the traditional brown-to-yellow-to-orange-to-black Fender/Gibson style sunburst that I strongly dislike.

1 Like

I love the natural wood finishes, I’m just not a big fan of the wood bursts.

2 Likes

Sticking with bass physical design characteristics, the classic Fender body shapes (Precision, Jazz) are well-thought out, beloved, and have withstood the test of time. The descendent Music Man body and its polarizing pickguard shape has also become a follow-on modern-day classic.

Other, classic designs include the iconic Hofner violin bass and the venerable Rickenbacker solid body, both famously made famous by McCartney.

Some true modern-day body/headstock bass styles logically derived from shredder-oriented electric guitars.

Other modern, intentionally non-Fender designs came about from the artistic minds and hands of boutique luthiers. The afore-mentioned Marcus Miller M series later adopted many of the design cues from those multi-thousand-dollar basses to manufacture a production model at a ridiculously accessible price.

Of two of the major Canadian small-shop builders, Dingwall and FBass, I much prefer FBass designs. Dingwalls are no doubt great instruments, but fan-fret ultra-modern is not my personal bag. No diss on anyone who digs them, though.

3 Likes

I think I have the similar likes in taste and styles. Fugly might be too strong of a word but I find it hard to find a combination that I really like without any modifications as someone mentioned. The Yamaha I found very appealing.

3 Likes

I definitely prefer more modern and/or quirky styles for bass over traditional Fender shapes.

2 Likes

Hehe, I knew you had good taste :wink:

Nods, the Yamaha and the Dingwall were both love at first sight for me.

3 Likes

Absolutely!!! Me too. I saw the Combustion and just knew I would buy one.

It was the fan-fret that shook me, all night long!!! I love ‘em! But I like a ‘modern’ style - I’ve got a Steinberger (ok, this is no longer modern, in that it’s really associated with the 80s) but I think it’s just so cool. As is my modern headless Ibanez EHB1000S.

What I don’t like is the traditional Fender shape, whether a P, a Jazz or a PJ. F’ugly? I wouldn’t go that far, just not for me…

3 Likes

It’s all good.

Since we each have our bass prefs and we vote with our GAS wallets, together, we’ll keep the various bass builders in business. :money_mouth_face:

4 Likes

Back in the day before I bought my Ken Smith

I thought this was the ugliest bass.
IMG_1897

3 decades later it’s one of my most favorite looks.

3 Likes

Form follows function. There is beauty in what they do. No one buys a hammer for its looks. The looks on a bass are the icing

3 Likes

Oh I don’t know about that!

4 Likes