I know there are hundreds of Bass styles to choose from, but does anyone else feel that a large majority of Bass designs are Fugly? Why is that the case?
No
Cause most donât mod their basses
Nope, I donât think the majority of bass designs are fugly. I viscerally dislike two different models Iâve seen, but thatâs about it.
But no I donât agree with the original question. In fact I kind of think the opposite. I think most basses (and guitars) are works of art. Even the âcrappyâ mass produced beginner ones. There are designs I donât like, and there are designs I like but donât like playing the bass.
I am a huge fan of the more quirky designs. Ironically the more traditional ones donât interest me as much.
Whatâs interesting (to me anyway) is I am not that way on guitar. I like the classically inspired ones as well.
Fugly might be too strong a term but I definitely have a specific look I go for and when I skim through sweetwater there are very few that match.
Yamaha TBRX line, Dingwall Combustion, Ibanez SR series, Schecter C series, Sire Marcus Miller M series, and ESP Ltd B and F series body shapes are the only ones I like 100% and wouldnât change a thing on.
Of the above colour options limit the selection even more. Sire have a habit of putting skunk stripes round the edges of the colours I really like, which I donât like.
I dislike nearly all brown bursts
I donât dislike Danelectro instruments per se, but they make me giggle
Antigua is right out
Otherwise, I love me some exceptionally odd basses. As should be clear by my buying habits and SBV worship.
Hmmm⌠I kind of agree on the wood colored bursts. Saying that my 6 string and my Reverend are both wood colored bursts. The Epi, Iâve had for decades and isnât going anywhere. The Reverend, Iâll deal with the color because I got the bass for more than half off (and was brand new when I bought it).
Actually natural ones can be quite nice. Itâs the traditional brown-to-yellow-to-orange-to-black Fender/Gibson style sunburst that I strongly dislike.
I love the natural wood finishes, Iâm just not a big fan of the wood bursts.
Sticking with bass physical design characteristics, the classic Fender body shapes (Precision, Jazz) are well-thought out, beloved, and have withstood the test of time. The descendent Music Man body and its polarizing pickguard shape has also become a follow-on modern-day classic.
Other, classic designs include the iconic Hofner violin bass and the venerable Rickenbacker solid body, both famously made famous by McCartney.
Some true modern-day body/headstock bass styles logically derived from shredder-oriented electric guitars.
Other modern, intentionally non-Fender designs came about from the artistic minds and hands of boutique luthiers. The afore-mentioned Marcus Miller M series later adopted many of the design cues from those multi-thousand-dollar basses to manufacture a production model at a ridiculously accessible price.
Of two of the major Canadian small-shop builders, Dingwall and FBass, I much prefer FBass designs. Dingwalls are no doubt great instruments, but fan-fret ultra-modern is not my personal bag. No diss on anyone who digs them, though.
I think I have the similar likes in taste and styles. Fugly might be too strong of a word but I find it hard to find a combination that I really like without any modifications as someone mentioned. The Yamaha I found very appealing.
I definitely prefer more modern and/or quirky styles for bass over traditional Fender shapes.
Hehe, I knew you had good taste
Nods, the Yamaha and the Dingwall were both love at first sight for me.
Absolutely!!! Me too. I saw the Combustion and just knew I would buy one.
It was the fan-fret that shook me, all night long!!! I love âem! But I like a âmodernâ style - Iâve got a Steinberger (ok, this is no longer modern, in that itâs really associated with the 80s) but I think itâs just so cool. As is my modern headless Ibanez EHB1000S.
What I donât like is the traditional Fender shape, whether a P, a Jazz or a PJ. Fâugly? I wouldnât go that far, just not for meâŚ
Itâs all good.
Since we each have our bass prefs and we vote with our GAS wallets, together, weâll keep the various bass builders in business.
Back in the day before I bought my Ken Smith
I thought this was the ugliest bass.
3 decades later itâs one of my most favorite looks.
Form follows function. There is beauty in what they do. No one buys a hammer for its looks. The looks on a bass are the icing